The new atheists are putting out new books and articles, bus adverts and TV programmes like
there's no tomorrow. They've gained a large amount of public attention and media exposure -
but do their arguments really hold water? Using the analogy put forward by the esteemed
philosopher Anthony Flew, Michael Poole examines the new atheists' use of the 'ten leaky
buckets' tactic of argumentation - presenting readers with a sum of arguments that are each
individually defective, as though the cumulative effect should be persuasive. This closer look
at the facts reveals that the buckets are, indeed, leaky.
Michael Poole is Visiting Research Fellow in Science and Religion at King's College, London.
With Lion, he has also written The User's Guide to Science and Belief.